Approaching and Distancing: Diplomatic and Geopolitical Strategies in Russia and Turkiye Relations

Authors

  • James Onnig Tamdjian

Abstract

The article intends to contribute to discussions on the foreign policies of Moscow and Ankara focused on their immediate surroundings. Through an analysis of agreements and pacts, it understand how the infrastructure works, ethnic-cultural issues and military aspects are amalgamated in an extremely dynamic scenario since the end of the 20th century. It is in the field of economics that the mainstays of structural problems are found, which has origin in historical rivalries for hegemony in the territory, which is seen here as an expression of power. These disputes are, therefore, very specific forms managed by the diplomacies of countries sensitively guided by the logic of national identities. The result is questions arising whether in the field of international relations there are limits to so many distances and approximations, rivalries and pragmatisms between Turkey and Russia.

References

Karabekir Akkoyunlu (2020) The defeat of the 'real' neo-Ottomanists. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/the-defeat-of-the-real-neo-ottomanists/

David Barchard (2023) Turkey and West.

Yucel Bozdaglioglu (2008) Modernity, Identity and Turkey's Foreign Policy. 10(Number 1).

Zbigniew Brzezinski (1997) The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives.

Alexander Dugin (2009) Fourthy Political Theory.

Inessa Ivanova (2019) Turkey in Central Asia: a Partner or a Rival?. (Issue 7).

Igor Kapyrin Comunidade dos Estados Independentes: (C.E.I.): estudo introdut%C3%B3rio.

Joel Postma (2021) Drones over Nagorno-Karabakh: A glimpse at the future of war. 45(2), 15-20.

Kishor Uprety (2006) The Transit Regime for Landlocked States: International Law and Development Perspectives.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-26

How to Cite

Approaching and Distancing: Diplomatic and Geopolitical Strategies in Russia and Turkiye Relations. (2023). London Journal of Research In Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(15), 47-54. https://journalspress.uk/index.php/LJRHSS/article/view/857