A Contrastive Study of the Realizations of Elements in English and Myanmar Transitivity Configurations
Keywords:
accountability, Human Rights, case study, human services, rural social work, access to services, Myanmar, Systemic Functional Linguistics, contrastive study, realizations, transitivity configurations, EnglishAbstract
he main purpose of this paper is to contrast the realizations of elements – processes, participant roles and circumstances in the English and Myanmar transitivity configurations following the network developed within the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics. It is found that: English and Myanmar show similarity in the realizations of processes as verbal groups, participant roles as nominal groups, nominalization, adverbial groups, prepositional phrases, embedded clauses, and circumstances as nominal groups, adverbial groups, or prepositional phrases. However, they differ in that processes are also realized by copulas and participant roles by adjective/adjective groups in English, while processes are also realized by compound verbs, reduplicated verbs, or attributive verbs and circumstances by qualifying reduplicated adverbs or embedded clauses in Myanmar. The findings are rooted in the functional and typological prominences of the two languages, which may further shed light on a new perspective on the research of transitivity system for Systemic Functional Linguistics. This study also makes an important contribution to further studies of contrasting the realizations of elements in the transitivity configurations of Myanmar and other languages.
References
M. K. H. Al-Janabi (2013) Transitivity analysis in English and Arabic short narrative texts: A contrastive study. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337544166
T. Bloor, M. Bloor (1995) The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach.
J. E. Bridges (1915) Burmese Grammar.
A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (2004) Language Typology: A Functional Perspective.
A. Caffarel (2004) Metafunctional profile of the grammar of French. 77–138.
J. B. Carroll (1956) Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writtings of Benjamin Lee Whorf.
ĐĂNG THỊ CÂM NGỌC (2015) An Investigation into Linguistic Features of Material Processes in “Perfect Spy” by Larry Berman Versus its Vietnamese Translational Version by Do Hung.
K. Davidse (1992) Transitivity/ergativity: the Janus-headed grammar of actions and events. 105-135.
S. Eggins (1994) An Introduction into Systemic Functional Linguistics.
V. Evans, M. Green (2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction.
H. A. Gleason (1961) An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics.
R. P. Fawcett (1980) Cognitive Linguistics and Social Interaction: Towards an Integrated Model of a Systemic Functional Grammar and the Other Components of a Communicating Mind.
R. P. Fawcett (1987) The semantics of clause and verb for relational processes in English. 130–183.
R. P. Fawcett (2000) A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics.
R. P. Fawcett (2010) How to analyze participant roles and so processes in English.
R. P. Fawcett The functional semantics handbook: Analyzing English at the level of meaning.
M. A. K. Halliday (1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. 3, 199–244.
M. A. K. Halliday (1968) Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 3. 4, 179–215.
M. A. K. Halliday (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar.
M. A. K. Halliday (2000) An Introduction to Functional Grammar.
M. A. K. Halliday, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar.
M. A. K. Halliday, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (2014) An Introduction to Functional Grammar.
M. A. K. Halliday, E. McDonald (2004) Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Chinese.
A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. 305–396.
W. He, R. Zhang, X. Dan, F. Zhang, R. Wei (2017) Yingyu gongneng yuyi fenxi.
Hnin Lae Yee (2020) Reflection on Myanmar culture through transitivity analysis of the character “Mai Sein” in the short story The Shinlaung’s Father by Khin Myo Chit. 74-88.
Htin Lin (1999) Paletaye:than.
Z. L. Hu, Y. S. Zhu, D. L. Zhang, Z. Z. Li (2005) A Survey of Systemic Functional Linguistics.
G. W. Huang (2000) Systemic functional linguistics: Forty years on. 1, 15-21.
B. A. Hussein (2012) The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Today. 2(3), 642-646.
M. Jenny, San San Hnin Tun (2016) Burmese: A Comprehensive Grammar.
Kyaw Ma Ma Lay (1957) Thuema.
M. Kaffashi, H. Gowhary, A. Jamalinesari, A. Azizifar (2015) A contrastive study of relational attributive clauses in narrative texts in English and Persian based on Halliday (2004). 156-165.
Lae Twin Thar Saw Chit (2004) Kyanoramonnzonkyanor [The person I hate most is me]. http://www.myanmarbookshop.com/MyanmarBooks/BookDetails/19951
Lai Yee Win (2021) Construction of the transitivity system of Myanmar. 7(1), 1-43.
J. Lavid, J. Arus (2002) Nuclear transitivity in English and Spanish: A contrastive functional study. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233675496
F. G. Li (2004) Experiential function and translation of clauses. (7), 46-50.
F. G. Li (2004) Equivalent translation between process of transitivity and semantic functions. (2), 26-30.
J. Li, C. Song (2005) Gongneng yufa daolun disanban shuping [Review of An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn.]. (4), 315–318.
A. W. Lonsdale (1899) Burmese Grammar and Grammatical Analysis.
N. Lund (2003) Language and Thought.
J. R. Martin (2004) Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Tagalog. 255–304.
J. R. Martin, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, C. Painter (1997) Working with Functional Grammar.
J. R. Martin, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, C. Painter (2010) Deploying Functional Grammar.
C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (1995) Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English systems.
Maung Htin Aung (1962) Burmese law tales.
Min Thit, Thant Zin Win (2019) bagandaytha yuenetsakogabaamwayahnitsayinn winkhwin-tyabarga nainngantgonmyintmarrlarpyee kha eehwarrlokengannle myinttetlarnainmyephyit [Experts rally for Bagan's inclusion in World Heritage List].
Mohammed A. A. (2020) The impact of culture on English Language Learning. 7(8), 21-27.
Myint Soe (1999) A Grammar of Burmese.
NGUYÊN PHAN CÂM TÚ (2011) An Investigation into Linguistic Features of Participants in the Processes in English and Vietnamese from the Functional Grammar Aspect.
H. V. Phan, T. T. T. Nguyen (2015) A study of typology of behavioral clauses in English and Vietnamese in the light of functional grammar. 3(6), 347-352.
V. Prakasam (2004) Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Telugu. 433–478.
D. Rose (2004) Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Pitjantjatjara. 479–536.
Science Mg Wa (1998) Mitharrsuletywaye: sinwitutomyarr [Family selected novellas].
John Steinbeck (1945) The Pearl.
E. Steiner, E. Teich (2004) Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of German. 139–184.
Soe Soe Nain (2019) pyethuepyetharrmyarri ayayachinnthe adika [The qualification of the People is main]. https://www.burmalibrary.org/sites/burmalibrary.org/files/obl/mal_14.3.19.pdf
K. Teruya (2004) Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Japanese. 185–254.
Thadinnsin (2019) nainngandori atainbinkhanpokego doraunsannsukye hnit (khunhnase) pyayt paotamyoetharrnayt (akyo) akhannanarrthot tetyaukmeintkhunnpyawkyarr [State Counsellor attends event to mark]. https://www.burmalibrary.org/sites/burmalibrary.org/files/obl/mal_14.3.19.pdf
M. D. Thai (2004) Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Vietnamese. 397-432.
G. Thompson (2004) Introducing Functional Grammar.
A. Vittrant (2005) Burmese as a modality-prominent language. 143-162.
A. Y. Wahyudin (2016) A study of transitivity system: An analysis of process type used in news item. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332230397
J. Watkins (2005) Studies in Burmese Linguistics.
A. Wierzbicka (1997) Understanding Cultures through their Key Words.
S. Yuli, Z. Yushan (2012) A comparison of transitivity system in English and Chinese. 8(4), 75-80.
Jin Zhao (2011) khitthitmyanmarphatsar [Modern Myanmar textbook].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
