Can They Say Anything?: Specious Justifications for Policy Positions
Keywords:
think tanks network. liberal institutes. ideological battle. neoliberalism., Chick Lit, female agency, the devil wears prada, new domesticity, doll's house, we-media; cultural transmission; LDA-based topic modelling; VADER; sentiment analysis, Policy Support, Elite Communications, Partisanship, ExperimentsAbstract
Can messages from leadership affect views of the agencies that carries out policy? I conducted four survey experiments with U.S. samples of about 1,000 likely voters per experiment. Treatments randomized the quality of presidential messages, from reasonable to specious, and I evaluate how perceptions of the policy and the administering agency change from each message. The messages are purposely varied to be specious and ridiculous at times to test how agencies might be penalized by poorly constructed rhetoric. Results show that partisan leaders can increase support for their preferred policy and themselves, but perceptions of administrative agencies show little change. These results suggest that the dynamics of opinion formation for policies and leaders operate differently than opinion formation for the public agencies that might carry out policies.
References
Christopher H. Achen, Lyndeborough M. Bartels (2017) Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government.
David E. Broockman, Daniel M. Butler (2017) The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication. 61(1), 208-221.
Joshua G. Bullock (2011) Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. 496-515.
James N. Druckman (2001) The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. 23(3), 225-256.
James N. Druckman (2004) Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir) relevance of framing effects. 98(4), 671-686.
James N. Druckman, Katherine R. Nelson (2003) Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. 47(4), 729-745.
(2014) Governor Christie State Of The State Address Transcript. http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2014/01/14/governor-christie-state-of-the-state-address-transcript/
D. Chong, J. N. Druckman (2007) Framing theory. 10, 103-126.
P. E. Converse (2006) The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). 18(1-3), 1-74.
G. W. Cox, M. D. McCubbins (2005) Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives.
A. S. Gerber, D. P. Green (2012) Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation.
S. Iyengar, D. R. Kinder (2010) News that matters: Television and American opinion.
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky (2013) Choices, values, and frames. 269-278.
G. S. Lenz (2013) Follow the leader?: how voters respond to politicians' policies and performance.
L. W. Miratrix, J. S. Sekhon, A. G. Theodoridis, L. F. Campos (2018) 26(3), 275-291.
C. Mudde (2004) The populist zeitgeist. 39(4), 542%E2%80%93563.
S. P. Nicholson (2012) Polarizing cues. 56(1), 52-66.
P. M. Sniderman, J. Bullock (2004) A consistency theory of public opinion and political choice: The hypothesis of menu dependence. 337-357.
T. Sneed (2012) "Is Newt Gingrich Right About Going to the Moon?". U.S. News and World Report. Online edition
M. R. Tomz, J. L. Weeks (2013) Public opinion and the democratic peace. 849-865.
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. 211(4481), 453-458.
J. R. Zaller (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion.
C. Wlezien (1995) The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. 981-1000.
C. Wlezien, S. N. Soroka (2012) Political institutions and the opinion%E2%80%93policy link. 35(6), 1407-1432.
WSLS 10 Local News (2020) President Trump suggests injecting disinfectant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYJY_elndY8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
