Application of Synthetic Identities in Automated Fraud Detection Systems
Keywords:
: Formal system development validation and verification dependability and certificationAbstract
raud detection systems play an increasingly pivotal role in the world of digital business transactions. As the business world embraces digital platforms, industries ranging from finance and banking to insurance and e-commerce are exposed to sophisticated fraudulent activities[1]. The ability to detect and prevent fraudulent transactions has become not just a security measure but a determinant of business success. Automated fraud detection systems stand at the forefront of this fight, identifying potential fraudulent behavior and mitigating risks. A cornerstone of these fraud detection systems is machine learning, an AI-driven technique where algorithms learn to make decisions based on patterns in data. Machine learning models are designed to differentiate between legitimate transactions and potential fraud, thus allowing businesses to flag and handle suspicious activities effectively. These models require data to learn from; the more comprehensive, varied, and representative the data, the more effectively the models can identify patterns and make accurate predictions. However, obtaining a vast and representative dataset for fraud detection presents a two-fold challenge.
References
Marwan Ali Albahar (2019) Detecting fraudulent twitter profiles: A model for fraud detection in online social networks. 15(5), 1629-1639.
Philmore Alleyne, Michael Howard (2005) An exploratory study of auditors' responsibility for fraud detection in barbados. 20(3, SI), 284+.
Galina Baader, Robert Meyer, Christoph Wagner, Helmut Krcmar (2016) Specification and implementation of a data generator to simulate fraudulent user behavior. 67-78.
B Bhargava, YH Zhong, YH Lu (2003) Fraud formalization and detection. 2737, 330-339.
W Chen, C Wong (2019) The effects of a sustainability code on environmental performance: A case study in the manufacturing sector. 246, 351-367.
S Johnson, H Nguyen (2019) The influence of code implementation on financial performance: A comparative analysis. 42(3), 245-264.
Leazek Lilien, Akhil Bhargava, Bharat Bhargava (2009) From fraud vulnerabilities and threats to fraud avoidance and tolerance. 5(1), 16-24.
R Peterson, K Anderson (2018) Exploring the effects of code implementation on employee satisfaction and engagement. 643-659.
A. Smithson, L. Johnson, M. Carter (2017) The Impact of Code Implementation on Operational Efficiency.
M. Thompson, J. Roberts (2020) The impact of a code of customer relations on customer loyalty in the service industry. 37(4), 567%E2%80%93585.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
