Enhancing Learning Through Game Flow: A Case Study for Epistemic Game “Working With Water”
Keywords:
learning, case study, Epistemic games, GameFlow, Game evaluationAbstract
Epistemic video games, interpreted as video games pursuing new knowledge through the mechanism that concatenates practices and cognition, grab numerous attention on account of their extensive implementation since COVID-19. The corresponding academic explorations into the players, especially indicating the students, have largely integrated in game enjoyment and the principals exerted. Understanding the essential factors that promote game enjoyment that aligns with educational purposes is crucially important for clarifying the mechanism of epistemic games. Consequently, the present study adopts the GameFlow model presented by Sweetser and Wyeth (2005), whose accuracy has been verified and yields to evaluate enjoyment of video games by examining specific criteria under eight elements: concentration, challenge, player skills, control, clear goals, feedback, immersion, and social interaction of the model. The highly acclaimed epistemic game “Working with Water” is elected to conduct a case study by implementing the Game Flow model. The result indicates that the overall values for Game Flow cohere with the performance, usability, and potentiality of the epistemic games. The model performs well in the evaluation of epistemic games to a large extent. but simultaneously limited to the intrinsic harshness of the specific genre that differs from others in the degree of enjoyment. As a result, the evaluating model based on GameFlow is worthy of inquiry in an educational context for further investigation.
References
R. Bernhaupt, M. Eckschlager, M. Tscheligi (2007) Methods for evaluating games. https://doi.org/10.1145/1255047.1255142
J. Chen (2007) Flow in games (and everything else). 50(4), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/1232743.1232769
A. J. Collins, W. Ferguson (1993) Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry. 28(1), 25-42.
M. Csikszentmihalyi (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-Fro mm/frontdoor/index/index/docId/27641
E. Fassbender, D. Richards, A. Bilgin, W. R. Thompson, W. Heiden (2012) VirSchool: The effect of background music and immersive display systems on memory for facts learned in an educational virtual environment. 58(1), 490-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp.edu.2011.09.002
F. Fu, R. Su, S. Yu (2009) EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners' enjoyment of e-learning games. 52(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004
J. C. Gee (2004) What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. (4). https://doi.org/10.1108/et.2004.00446dae.002
J. P. Gee (2005) Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines. 2(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5
Y. Inal, K. Cagiltay (2007) Flow experiences of children in an interactive social game environment. 38(3), 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00709.x
J. Parviainen, A. Koski, S. Torkkola (2021) 'Building a Ship while Sailing It.' Epistemic Humility and the Temporality of Non-knowledge in Political Decision-making on COVID-19. 35(3), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2021.1882610
Rocket Brush Studio (2022) How to Choose The Art Style That Fits Your Game. https://rocketbrush.com/blog/how-to-choose-art-style-for-your-game
D. W. Shaffer (2006) Epistemic frames for epistemic games. 46(3), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.com.pedu.2005.11.003
D. W. Shaffer, K. Squire, R. Halverson, J. C. Gee (2005) Video Games and the Future of Learning. 87(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700205
P. Sweetser, P. Wyeth (2005) GameFlow. 3(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253
P. Vorderer, C. Klimmt, U. Ritterfeld (2004) Enjoyment: At the Heart of Media Entertainment. 14(4), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00321.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
