A Dynamic Framework for a GeoAI-Driven Updatable Master Planning System

Authors

  • Dr. Hossny Mohammad Azizalrahman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34257/LJRCST227900UK

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, City master plan, Deep Learning, Development strategies, Geomatics, GIS, Planning approaches.

Abstract

Traditional master planning often relies on decadal, static documents that fail to account for the rapid spatio-temporal dynamics of modern urban environments. This divergence between planned and actual land use creates systemic inefficiencies in urban governance. This research proposes a GeoAI-driven framework—a formal systems approach that integrates Geomatics, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Deep Learning (DL) into a live, updatable “City Engine.” The framework utilises Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for automated change detection and GIS-based heuristic rules for instant plan versioning. By shifting the master plan from a static atlas to a dynamic “body of knowledge,” the proposed system enables real-time monitoring, evaluation, and publishing of urban development strategies. The results demonstrate that such a system can significantly bridge the implementation gap, offering a scalable model for smart city governance and sustainable regional development.

References

J. Anderson, K. Lee (2022) Integrating Deep Learning Models in Urban Planning: A Heuristic Approach to GIS Updates. 29(4), 1–22.

L. Bastin, F. van der Meer (2023) Spatial and spectral deep learning for change detection in remote sensing: A case study with satellite imagery. 15(4), 873.

R. A. Beauregard, A. Colomina (2011) More than a master plan: Amman 2025. 28(1), 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.002

P. Berke, M. Backhurst, M. Day, N. Ericksen, L. Laurian, J. Crawford, J. Dixon (2016) What Makes Plan Implementation Successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand. https://doi.org/10.1068/b31166

T. Brown (2024) GIS in Modern City Planning. 35(2).

T. Byambadorj, M. Amati, K. J. Ruming (2011) Twenty-first-century nomadic city: Ger districts and barriers to implementing the Ulaanbaatar City Master Plan. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2011.01448

B. Caulfield (2023) How AI Helps Fight Wildfires in California. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/ai-wildfires-california/

H. Cheng, D. Shaw (2017) Polycentric development practice in master planning: the case of China.

C. Cortinovis, D. Geneletti (2018) Ecosystem services in urban plans: What is there, and what is still needed for better decisions. 70, 298-312.

M. De Jong, R. Sijbesma (2023) Engaging cities: The role of digital dashboards in participatory urban planning. 30(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2022.2061319

V. Dutta (2012) Land Use Dynamics and Peri-urban Growth Characteristics: Reflections on Master Plan and Urban Suitability from a Sprawling North Indian City. 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425312473226

K. Granqvist, R. Mäntysalo (2020) Strategic Turn in Planning and the Role of Institutional Innovation. 73–90.

J. Gupta, P. Francis (2010) The challenge of urban planning in developing countries. 73(2), 59–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.017

(2018) ISO 37120:2018—Sustainable cities and communities—Indicators for city services and quality of life.

A. Johnson, L. Brown (2023) The Role of Drones in Enhancing Urban Management and Emergency Response.

M. Johnson, S. Lee (2023) Predictive Technologies in Environmental Management.

L. Jones, A. Müller (2023) Drone Technology in Swiss and German Urban Planning: Traffic and Safety Implications*. 12(1), 32-47.

H. H. Khan, M. N. Malik, R. Zafar, F. A. Goni, A. G. Chofreh, J. J. Klemeš, Y. Alotaibi (2020) Challenges for sustainable smart city development: A conceptual framework. 28(5), 1507-1518. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2090

H. Kim, T. Tran (2018) An evaluation of comprehensive plans toward sustainable green infrastructure in the US. 10(11), 4143.

A. Krieger, S. Teschner (2021) Real-time urban data: Leveraging IoT technologies for urban monitoring and insights. 7(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uac.2021.12.004

L. Laurian, M. Day, M. Backhurst, P. Berke, N. Ericksen, J. Crawford, J. Dixon, S. Chapman (2004) What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers. 47(4), 555.

W. Lyles, P. Berke, G. Smith (2015) Local plan implementation: assessing conformance and influence of local plans in the United States. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515604071

I. MacGregor-Fors, M. García-Arroyo, D. J. Kotze, E. Ojala, H. Setälä, S. Vauramo (2021) A more sustainable urban future calls for action: The city of Lahti as European Green Capital 2021. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juab026

V. Moustaka, A. Vakali, L. G. Anthopoulos (2018) A Systematic Review for Smart City Data Analytics. 51(5), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239566

L. Peter, Y. Yang (2019) Urban planning historical review of master plans and the way towards a sustainable city: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 8(3), 359-377.

A. Pleshkanovska (2019) City Master Plan: Forecasting methodology problems (using the Kyiv Master plans as an example).

M Russo (2016) Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk.

A. A. Shahraki (2022) Tourism development techniques in the urban master plan. 9(1), 2042977.

A. Smith (2022) Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning: Case Study of Strabo in France. 35(4), 112–130.

R. Smith, L. Torres (2023) Dynamic GIS Update Mechanisms: Adapting to Real-Time Urban Changes. 37(3), 501–520.

J. Smith, A. Jones, L. Martin (2022) The Role of AI in Enhancing Urban Resilience.

S. Srinivasan, P. Jha (2022) Temporal Analysis of Land Use Change Using Satellite Imagery and MachineLearning. 14(3), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030508

H. Stanton (2019) Integrating Hazard Mitigation Strategies into the City of Westport's Comprehensive Plan Update. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/45278

X. Su, Z. Qian (2020) Neoliberal planning master plan adjustment and overbuilding in China: The case of Ordos City.

L. Tian, T. Shen (2011) Evaluation of plan implementation in the transitional China: A case of Guangzhou city master plan. 28(1), 11-27.

(2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

T. Veldkamp, J. Bouma (2022) Modeling urban futures: A comparative analysis of simulation methods in urban planning. 49(3), 569-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320988717

J. Wang, P. Zhao (2023) Improving Land Cover Mapping with High-Resolution Satellite Imagery and Deep Learning Techniques. 189, 200-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.10.021

M. Wolfram, S. Borgstrom, M. Farrelly (2019) Urban transformative capacity: From concept to practice. 48, 437-448.

L. Zhang, X. Li (2022) Deep Learning for Land Cover Classification from Remote Sensing Imagery: A Review. 14(5), 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051142

Z. Zhu, C. Liu (2022) Deep learning for remote sensing images: A comprehensive review of techniques and applications. 180, 14–30.

A Dynamic Framework for a GeoAI-Driven Updatable Master Planning System

Downloads

Published

2026-06-11

How to Cite

A Dynamic Framework for a GeoAI-Driven Updatable Master Planning System. (2026). London Journal of Research In Computer Science and Technology, 26(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.34257/LJRCST227900UK