A Critical Analysis of Governance Failures, Fiduciary Responsibilities, and the Path Forward

Authors

  • Dr. Eyong Atem

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34257/LJRCST225812UK

Keywords:

AI governance, AI risk management, algorithmic accountability, board oversight, corporate governance, digital transformation, enterprise risk management, ethical AI, executive AI literacy, fiduciary duty, regulatory compliance, strategic alignment

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence into organizational decision-making has fundamentally altered how value is created, risks are managed, and authority is exercised within modern enterprises. Yet, while AI systems increasingly influence high-stakes outcomes, the governance mechanisms that oversee them have not evolved at the same pace. A critical vulnerability has emerged: executives and board members are frequently tasked with governing AI systems they do not sufficiently understand. This article argues that AI governance without executive AI literacy represents a structural governance failure rather than a technical shortcoming. The article examines how low levels of AI literacy among executives undermine strategic alignment, weaken risk oversight, and expose organizations to ethical, regulatory, and reputational harm. It demonstrates why traditional corporate governance and enterprise risk management frameworks are ill-suited to address AI-specific risks, including algorithmic bias, data misuse, opacity, and cascading system failures. Rather than positioning AI literacy as optional or advisory, the article reframes it as a fiduciary and governance imperative essential to informed oversight and responsible decision-making. To address this challenge, the article presents an integrated AI governance approach centered on executive literacy and structured around technical understanding, strategic oversight, ethical accountability, and regulatory compliance, supported by continuous learning and adaptive governance. The article concludes that organizations that embed AI literacy at the executive level are better positioned to realize AI’s benefits while mitigating its risks, whereas those that fail to do so face growing governance, performance, and legitimacy deficits in the AI era.

References

D. Fehrer (2024) AI leadership for corporate boards.

M. Sundararajan (2025) How Corporate Boards Must Approach AI Governance. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5016014

R. Eitel-Porter (2021) Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI. 1, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43681-020-00011-6

A. Ganguly (2025) The Governance Vacuum in Medical Device AI: Toward an Equitable and Accountable Framework. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/unq6y_v2

A. Sharma (2024) Governance and Oversight of AI Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0796-1_28

R. Agarwal (2025) A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certification. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2025-0065

A. Costanza-Chock (2022) Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystem. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533213

I. D. Raji (2022) Actionable Auditing Revisited. 65, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571151

M. Giordani (2024) An Empirical Study on Enterprise-Wide Governance Practices for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejaset.2024.2(6).16

R. Rao (2024) Integrating Ethical AI in Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practice.

M. Kumar (2024) AI-Augmented Corporate Governance: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Independent Directors.

L. Iseko (2025) Diversity as Ethical Infrastructure: Reimagining AI Governance for Justice and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251305.13

A. Warczak Giving Compliance Its Due: Caremark Duties in the Context of Mergers and Acquisitions. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3971236

P. Ho (2023) Board Duties: Monitoring, Risk Management, and Compliance.

S. Roy (2025) Artificial Intelligence in Corporate Financial Strategy: Transforming Long-Term Investment and Capital Budgeting Decisions. https://doi.org/10.32996/jefas.2025.7.5.6

D. Torre (2024) Board Guidance of AI Operational Capabilities: Navigating Strategic Opportunities and Governance Challenges.

J. Buolamwini, T. Gebru (2018) Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. 81, 1-15.

C. O'Neil (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy.

S. Barocas, A. D. Selbst (2016) Big Data's Disparate Impact. 104, 671-732.

M. Brundage (2020) Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims.

Egwuatu (2025) Ethical and Governance Challenges of AI in Information Systems: Toward Responsible Adoption in Enterprise Systems. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.27.2.3064

Patil (2025) Ethical Challenges In Industrial Artificial Intelligence Applications: Bias, Privacy, And Accountability. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5057418

Nangoy (2025) Toward Ethical AI: Strategies for Responsible AI Governance. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2025.7.5.13

Kim (2025) Navigating algorithmic equity: uncovering diversity and inclusion incidents in artificial intelligence. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijaair-v02i07-01

Rao Integrating Ethical AI in Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practice.

Kumar AI-Augmented Corporate Governance: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Independent Directors.

Suri The New Boardroom Perspective-Why We Need More Voices, Inclusivity, and AI.

Ahmed ENSURING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY IN AI-DRIVEN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Thuraisingham (2020) Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Governance: Roles and Responsibilities at the C-Level and the Board. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI49571.2020.00052

Sharma (2024) Governance and Oversight of AI Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0796-1_28

Mirishli (2025) The Role of Legal Frameworks in Shaping Ethical Artificial Intelligence Use in Corporate Governance. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.14540

Ho Board Duties: Monitoring, Risk Management, and Compliance.

D. Torre The Future of Board Work and Call to Action.

Salehi (2025) Boardroom AI: The Governance of AI-Assisted Corporate Decision-Making. https://doi.org/10.55677/gjefr/08-2025-vol02e4

R. Agarwal STRUCTURING THE BARRIERS OF AI INTEGRATION IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

R. Eitel-Porter (2021) Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43681-020-00011-6

D. Torre AI Leadership for Corporate Boards.

M. Kumar AI-Augmented Corporate Governance: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Independent Directors.

Petro (2025) AI in the Boardroom: Preparing Leaders for Responsible Governance. https://doi.org/10.4128/9781637427873

Ney (2023) Diretorias e conselhos ciborgue: A inteligência artificial na alta liderança. https://doi.org/10.12660/gvexec.v22n4.2023.89634

I. D. Raji (2022) Actionable Auditing Revisited. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571151

D. Torre Board Guidance of AI Operational Capabilities.

Mulamula The role of the board in artificial intelligence technologies governance.

DAS CHAPTER EIGHTEEN AI DECISION MAKING IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: NAVIGATING BOARD DUTIES UNDER THE AUSTRALIAN CORPORATIONS ACT.

A. Ganguly (2025) The Governance Vacuum in Medical Device AI: Toward an Equitable and Accountable Framework. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/unq6y_v1

Fields (2024) Governance for Anti-Racist AI in Healthcare: Integrating Racism-Related Stress in Psychiatric Algorithms for Black Americans. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3jqgc

Sharma Algorithmic Bias in the Workplace: Governance Strategies for Fair and Responsible AI.

P.R. et al. (2024) Algorithmic solutions, subjectivity and decision errors: a study of AI accountability. https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-05-2024-0090

Bharambe (2025) Open-Source AI Algorithms: A Qualitative Study on Transparency, Bias Mitigation, and Ethical Accountability. https://doi.org/10.63680/hgcfnnh854

A Critical Analysis of Governance Failures, Fiduciary Responsibilities, and the Path Forward

Downloads

Published

2026-06-11

How to Cite

A Critical Analysis of Governance Failures, Fiduciary Responsibilities, and the Path Forward. (2026). London Journal of Research In Computer Science and Technology, 26(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.34257/LJRCST225812UK