Investigating Machine Learning Models for Effective Dataset Training in Cardiac Arrest Prediction
Keywords:
composite plate; differential quadrature method; genetic algorithm; non-destructive method; modal analysis., Artificial Intelligence; Machine learning; Dataset; Encode, Prediction models.Abstract
Inaccuracy of data coupled with invasiveness in diagnosis of cardiac arrest is an issue of concern in clinical setting. In this study, the identification and prediction of cardiac arrest based on existing data was investigated using Machine learning (ML) algorithms. Three classic models of machine learning (Gradient Boost, Random Forest and XG Boost) models were used. Numerical variables were encoded using Label Encoder function from Scikit learn using the three models to train the data. A panda was used for data loading. After training, Gradient boosting, Random Forest and XG Boost models possess an accuracy of prediction values of 88, 89 and 85% with and an error prediction values of 23, 20 and 27, respectively. Hence fitting Gradient boosting model is the best machine learning model for training data and prediction of cardiac arrest due to its high accuracy and low error value.
References
M. Al-sharqi, W. J. Woodward, J. A. Mumith, D. C. Markham, R. Upton, P. Leeson (2018) Artificial intelligence and echocardiography. 5, 115%E2%80%93125.
A. Chandran (2019) How artificial neural networks work, from the math up. 6, 123-127.
F. Jiang, Y. Jiang, H. Zhi (2017) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. 2(4), 230%E2%80%93243.
K. W. Johnson, S. J. Torres, B. S. Glicksberg (2018) Artificial intelligence in cardiology. 71, 2668%E2%80%932679.
C. Krittanawong, H. Zhang, Z. Wang (2017) Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine. 69, 2657%E2%80%932664.
A. Kulkarni, S. Vijay kumar (2016) Application of Internet of Things in artificial heart pacemakers and its impact on security. 2(5), 604%E2%80%93610.
C. Li, X. Hu, L. Zhang (2017) The IoT-based heart disease monitoring system for pervasive healthcare service. 112, 2328%E2%80%932334.
Mayo Clinic (2016) Heart disease - tests and diagnosis. http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-disease/basics/tests-diagnosis/con-20034056
T. B. Murdoch, A. S. Detsky (2013) The inevitable application of big data to health care. 309(13), 1351-1352.
M. Nadrjanski, T. Foster (2022) Computed tomography. https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-9027
S. Narula, K. Shameer, A. M. S. Omar, J. T. Dudley, P. P. Sengupta (2016) Machine-learning algorithms to automate morphological and functional assessments in 2D echocardiography. 68(21), 2287-2295.
Nature (2016) Anticipating artificial intelligence. 532, 413.
T. A. Retson, A. H. Besser, S. Sall, D. Golden, A. Hsiao (2019) Machine learning and deep neural networks in thoracic and cardiovascular imaging. 34(3), 192-201.
D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, R. J. Williams (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. 323(6088), 533-536.
K. Seetharam, N. Kagiyama, P. P. Sengupta (2019) Application of mobile health, telemedicine and artificial intelligence to echocardiography. 6(2), 41%E2%80%9352.
D. Singh (2020) Holter monitoring. https://cadenceheart.sg/service/holter-monitoring/
H. Thomas, J. Diamond, A. Vieco (2018) Global atlas of cardiovascular disease 2000-2016: the path to prevention and control. 143%E2%80%93163.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
