A Hybrid Multi-Attribute Framework for Optimizing Turnaround Inspection Scope in Oil and Gas Facilities

Authors

  • Dr. Mohamed Attia

Keywords:

Gyroscopic effect, Straight cylindrical gears, Dynamic characteristics, Vortex

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to support operating facilities in identifying the appropriate and adequate initial turnaround (TA) inspection scope strategies and prioritizing operation, maintenance & engineering efforts to help deliver production operational targets by limiting the TA on to the equipment that internal inspection is necessary and avoid unnecessary replacement of internal parts (e.g., catalysts, desiccant, etc.) due to exposing the equipment to internal inspection. Furthermore, identify the inspections that can be performed non-intrusively and online, which can shorten the TA duration, minimize business interruption, and maximize plant availability.

Design/methodology/approach – The case study was conducted using one of the most widely deployed risk models in the oil and gas industry, where a full assessment was performed on an offshore gas-producing platform.

References

Huairui Guo, et al. (2015) On Determining Optimal Inspection Interval for Minimizing Maintenance Cost. 1–7.

Leonardo Leoni, et al. (2021) On Risk-Based Maintenance: A Comprehensive Review of Three Approaches to Track the Impact of Consequence Modelling for Predicting Maintenance Actions. 72, 104555-.

A.S.R. Murthy, V.N.A. Naikan (1996) Condition monitoring strategy: a risk-based interval selection. 34(1), 285-96.

R.B. Hey (2019) Turnaround Management for the Oil, Gas, and Process Industries: A Project Management Approach.

P. Ekel, W. Pedrycz, J. Pereira (2019) Multicriteria Decision-Making under Conditions of Uncertainty: A Fuzzy Set Perspective.

M Bertolini, et al. (2009) Development of Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance Procedures for an Oil Refinery. 22(2), 244–253.

Hesham K. Alfares (2023) Applied Optimization in the Petroleum Industry.

N. Arunraj, J. Maiti (2007) Risk-based maintenance – techniques and applications. 142(3), 653-661.

K. Khan, R. Sadiq, M. Haddara (2004) Risk-based inspection and maintenance (RBIM): multi-attribute decision making with aggregative risk analysis. 398–411.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Committee SC6000 (2000) Hazardous release protection.

L. Krishnasamy, F. Khan, M. Haddara (2005) Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generating plant. 18, 69–81.

U. Kumar (1998) Maintenance strategies for mechanized and automated mining systems: a reliability and risk analysis based approach. 46(11–12), 343–347.

K. A. L. Van Heel, B. Knegtering, A. C. Brombacher (1999) Safety lifecycle management. A flowchart presentation of the IEC 61508 overall safety lifecycle model. 15, 493–500.

S. More, R. Tuladhar, D. Grainger, W. Milne (2024) Maintenance decision-making and its relevance in engineering asset management. 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21595/marc.2024.23687

T.L. Saaty (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process.

B.L. Golden, E.A. Wasil, P.T. Harker (1989) The Analitic Hierarchy Process.

Y. Wang, G. Cheng, H. Hu, W. Wu (2012) Development of a risk-based maintenance strategy using FMEA for a continuous catalytic reforming plant. 25(6), 958–965.

I. Alsyouf (2007) The role of maintenance in improving companies' productivity and profitability. 105(1), 70–78.

William Fauriat, Enrico Zio (2020) Optimization of an aperiodic sequential inspection and condition-based maintenance policy driven by value of information. 204, 107133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107133

R.E. Barlow, F. Proschan (1967) Mathematical theory of reliability.

M. Abdel-Hameed (1975) A gamma wear process. 24(2), 152–153.

M.R. Othman, R. Idris, M.H. Hassim, W.H.W. Ibrahim (2016) Prioritizing HAZOP analysis using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1104-4

J.M. Lafleur (2011) Probabilistic AHP and TOPSIS for multi-attribute decision-making under uncertainty. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2011.5747655

Optimising Shutdown Strategies. https://www.oilandgasiq.com/oil-and-gas-production-and-operations/whitepapers/optimising-shutdown-strategies

Salih O. Duffuaa, A. Raouf (2015) Planning and Control of Maintenance Systems: Modelling and Analysis.

N. Khanfri, E.H. et al (2023) New Hybrid MCDM Approach for an Optimal Selection of Maintenance Strategies: Results of a Case Study. 38(4), 724–745.

N. Meyer, J.J. Cho, R.G. Phillips (2014) Mitigating HS&E Risks for Oil & Gas Services Using a Comprehensive Risk Management Program during New Product Development. https://doi.org/10.2118/170440-MS

Vishal Lagad, Vibha Zaman (2015) Utilizing Integrity Operating Windows (IOWs) for Enhanced Plant Reliability & Safety. 35, 352–356.

Edoardo Arena, et al. (2022) RBI-IOWs Integrated Approach to Risk Assessment: Methodological Framework and Application. 79, 104838-.

Peter T. Wilson (2022) Managing the Mechanical Integrity of Pressure Equipment Using a Layers of Protection Framework and Incorporating Integrity Operating Windows. 79, 104821-.

API (2021) Recommended Practice 584, Integrity Operating Windows.

API (2023) Recommended Practice 970, Corrosion Control Document Systems.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-02

How to Cite

A Hybrid Multi-Attribute Framework for Optimizing Turnaround Inspection Scope in Oil and Gas Facilities. (2025). London Journal of Engineering Research, 25(2), 15-31. https://journalspress.uk/index.php/LJER/article/view/1401