Supervisory Stakeholders as Architects of Responsible Learning: Reframing Corporate Social Responsibility into Pedagogical Paradigm shifts in Higher Education.

Authors

  • Mr. Dennis Franscico Chandiona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34257/LJRMB226397UK

Abstract

This research explores how responsible institutional practices lead to changes in pedagogical paradigms within higher education. Utilizing Pedagogical Paradigm Shift Theory, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Theory, and Institutional Theory, it examines the ways supervisory stakeholders promote responsible and transformative educational settings. Ethical practices, governance, sustainability, and social impact efforts are examined as catalysts for teaching innovation. A quantitative method was employed to gather data through an online survey involving 371 students and supervisory stakeholders, with the sample size established using G*Power analysis. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was utilized to examine the connections between variables. Results indicate that ethical practices and governance serve as key drivers of pedagogical transformation, whereas sustainability and social impact strengthen institutional dedication. The research suggests that universities enhance ethical governance, integrate sustainability into strategic planning, and increase community involvement. It enhances literature by connecting CSR initiatives to educational innovation, proposing future studies on lasting and worldwide viewpoints.

References

M. Adhikariparajuli, A. Hassan, B. Siboni (2021) Corporate social responsibility reporting in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. 317, 128447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128447

A. Almawi (2024) University social responsibility: Conceptual evolution and implications for sustainable higher education governance. 25(2), 412-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2023-0251

H. Alshaer, N. Al-Kumaim, A. Alhazmi (2023) University social responsibility and knowledge sharing behaviour in higher education institutions. 15(4), 3562. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043562

P. Altbach, H. de Wit (2023) Global trends in higher education reform.

R. Rosley Anholon, I. Rampasso, S. Avila, V. Tiago, F. Sigahi c, G. Moraes, M. Serafim, W. Leal Filho (2024) Guidelines to enhance stakeholder management in higher education institutions.International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (2026). 27(2), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2024-0153

Ariel Tabuena, A. (2025) Governance, accountability, and stakeholder engagement in higher education: Reframing institutional leadership for sustainable academic transformation. 47(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2024.2398756

N. Aversano, P. Del Vecchio, F. Rossi (2022) University social responsibility and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from European higher education institutions. 29(3), 608-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2210

N. Aversano, G. Nicolò, G. Sannino, P. Polcini (2022) Corporate Social Responsibility, Stakeholder Engagement, and Universities. 12(3), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030079

A. Awad (2025) University social responsibility and sustainable community engagement: Evidence from higher education institutions. 17(3), 1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031287

Suleiman Bakar (2021) Investigating the Dynamics of Contemporary Pedagogical Approaches in Higher Education through Innovations, Challenges, and Paradigm Shifts. 1(1), 01-19. https://doi.org/10.56106/ssc.2021.009

Archie Carroll (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. 34(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-g

Archie Carroll, Kareem Shabana (2010) The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. 12(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x

J. Cohen (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.).

Paul DiMaggio, Walter Powell (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

J. Duterte (2024) Effective pedagogical strategies for digital learners. 9(9), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra18211

R. El Khoury (2023) Revitalizing education: Curriculum reform and program/course delivery restructuring. 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49265-5_7

O. Fatoki, T. Abiodun (2023) Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development in universities: The role of stakeholder engagement. 20(8), 5537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085537

Claes Fornell, David Larcker (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

R. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.

J. Hair, G. Hult, C. Ringle, M. Sarstedt (2021) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.).

J. Hair, G. Hult, C. Ringle, M. Sarstedt (2024) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).

Lara Johannsdottir, Brynhildur Davidsdottir (2024) Proposed paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors. 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00402-3

W. Leal Filho, A. Salvia, F. Frankenberger, A. Azul (2025) Advancing sustainable development through higher education institutions: Trends and future directions. 26(3), 567-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2023-0481

M. Lis (2023) Higher education institutions and digital transformation: Building university-enterprise collaborative relationships. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003363132

S. Marginson (2022) Paradigm shifts in higher education.

C. Medupin, S. Adamu, C. Uleanya, Y. Yassim (2024) Corporate social responsibility strategies and sustainable development goals in higher education institutions. 16(2), 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020915

Jack Mezirow (1997) Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. 1997(74), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401

G. Miotto, C. Del-Castillo-Feito, A. Blanco-González (2020) Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for higher education institutions’ social responsibility. 27(6), 2685-2698. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1989

U. Singh (2023) Sustainability Assessment of Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. 43, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecp2023-14728

C. Uleanya, S. Adamu, Y. Yassim (2025) Sustainability integration in higher education institutions: The role of stakeholder collaboration and governance structures. 26(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2024-0047

Y. Yassim, S. Adamu, C. Uleanya (2025) Stakeholder engagement and sustainability governance in higher education institutions. 17(2), 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17021043

Supervisory Stakeholders as Architects of Responsible Learning: Reframing Corporate Social Responsibility into Pedagogical Paradigm shifts in Higher Education.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

How to Cite

Supervisory Stakeholders as Architects of Responsible Learning: Reframing Corporate Social Responsibility into Pedagogical Paradigm shifts in Higher Education. (2026). London Journal of Research In Management & Business, 26(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.34257/LJRMB226397UK