Administrative Systems as Data Infrastructures: Rethinking State Capacity Through Work Management

Authors

  • Karol Jefessom Alves de Sousa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34257/LJRMB226694UK

Keywords:

data-driven governance, digital transformation; data infrastructures, public value, state capacity

Abstract

This article examines how administrative systems for work management can be reconceptualized as data infrastructures within the state, contributing to the development of analytical capacity in public organizations. While digital transformation in the public sector has largely focused on service delivery and citizen-facing platforms, less attention has been given to internal administrative systems through which governments generate and structure organizational data. To address this gap, the study adopts a qualitative single-case design, analyzing the development of the Integrated System for Attendance and Activity Management (SIGFA) in the State Secretariat for Planning of Piauí (SEPLAN/PI), Brazil. The methodological approach combines document analysis, observation of organizational routines, and exploratory interviews with key actors involved in the system’s design and implementation. The findings reveal structural limitations in traditional time-control systems, particularly their focus on presence-based monitoring and their limited capacity to generate structured data on institutional activities. In contrast, SIGFA illustrates how administrative systems can be reconfigured to integrate time registration, activity monitoring, and data visualization into coherent data flows, enhancing organizational visibility, coordination, and decision-making. The article advances three contributions: it conceptualizes administrative systems as institutional data infrastructures; proposes an analytical model based on data generation, integration, and utilization; and provides empirical evidence from a Global South context. It also highlights tensions between data-driven management and data-based control, contributing to debates on digital transformation, state capacity, and public value.

References

M. Andrews, L. Pritchett, M. Woolcock (2017) Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action.

D. Beer (2019) The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception.

G. C. Bowker, S. L. Star (1999) Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences.

(2011) Law No. 12,527, of November 18, 2011. https://www.planalto.gov.br

(2018) Law No. 13,709, of August 14, 2018 (General Data Protection Law). https://www.planalto.gov.br

(2020) Decree No. 10,332, of April 28, 2020. https://www.planalto.gov.br

(2023) Decree No. 11,350, of January 1, 2023. https://www.planalto.gov.br

P. Cavalcante, M. Camões (2017) Innovation in the public sector in Brazil: A research agenda.

M. A. Cunha, N. Reinhard (2015) Electronic government in Brazil: Recent developments and challenges. 32(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.004

N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (2018) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research.

P. Dunleavy, H. Margetts, S. Bastow, J. Tinkler (2022) Digital-era governance: IT corporations, the state and e-government.

P. N. Edwards, S. J. Jackson, G. C. Bowker, C. P. Knobel (2009) Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design.

U. Flick (2009) An introduction to qualitative research.

J. R. Gil-Garcia, S. S. Dawes, T. A. Pardo (2022) Digital government and public management research: Foundations and future directions.

A. A. Gomide, P. L. C. Cavalcante (2019) State capacities for development in the 21st century.

M. Janssen, H. van der Voort (2023) Data-driven government: Enabling and governing the use of data for public value. 40(2), 101707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101707

R. Kitchin (2014) The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences.

H. Margetts, P. Dunleavy (2023) The second wave of digital-era governance.

M. Mazzucato, R. Kattel (2020) COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. 36(S1), S256–S269. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa031

I. Mergel, N. Edelmann, N. Haug (2019) Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

(2020) The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en

(1994) Complementary Law No. 13, of January 3, 1994.

(2017) Normative Instruction No. 01/2017.

(2023) Law No. 8,202, of November 1, 2023.

(2025) Decree No. 23,842, of May 20, 2025.

R. R. C. Pires, A. A. Gomide (2016) Governance and state capacities: A comparative analysis of federal programs. 24(58), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987316245806

J.-C. Plantin, C. Lagoze, P. N. Edwards, C. Sandvig (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553

R. C. Sampaio, C. Ferri (2020) Digital public communication and citizen participation: Challenges for contemporary democracy. 71(3).

K. J. A. Sousa (2026) Institutional sustainability as a dynamic capability in the peripheral state. 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.66104/mwnr9752

K. J. A. Sousa, K. V. G. Fernandes, K. A. A. Sousa, M. M. Urra (2026) People governance, ESG, and state integrity. 23(4), e234909. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4909

K. J. A. Sousa, K. V. G. Fernandes, K. A. A. Sousa, M. M. Urra, A. S. Feitosa, D. A. Sousa (2026) Public servants as protagonists of digital transformation. 23(87). https://doi.org/10.54899/dcs.v23i87.4433

R. K. Yin (2018) Case study research and applications: Design and methods.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-25

How to Cite

Administrative Systems as Data Infrastructures: Rethinking State Capacity Through Work Management. (2026). London Journal of Research In Management & Business, 26(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.34257/LJRMB226694UK